On Tuesday, the
NTA directed four telecom companies—Ncell, Nepal
Telecom, United Telecom Limited (UTL) and Smart Telecom to stop providing the
SMS VAS service from their network. The service was provided by THT Live, a VAS
provider.
It enables
customer sending SMS in 6622 typing “who” space “mobile no” to find the name of
the mobile owner.
“Since the
service distributes the personal information to SMS sender, it is against the
personal freedom and create security threat,” said Arjun Ghimire, deputy
director of the NTA. He added that the service provider had not taken the
permission of the NTA for the service and tariffs to be charged. The service
charges Rs 2 excluding tax from the customers per SMS.
THT Live had
promoted the VAS service stating that customers using mobile service of Ncell , NT , UTL and Smart
could avail the “who” VAS service. However, Ncell said that the VAS provider
had launched the service without consultation and approval from it. “6622 has been
blocked from our SMS centre as it is against customer privacy,” said Sanju
Koirala, corporate communications director of Ncell.
After the
direction of the NTA, NT also stopped the VAS service on Wednesday afternoon. “We
have stopped the SMS service in 6622 short code,” said Surendra Prasad Thike,
deputy managing director of the NT. He added that they were trying to find out
how the service became possible in their network.
This is the
first time the government moved strict in any VAS amid increasing number of different
VAS services. An official at the NTA said that the THT Live had introduced the
“who” service based on the latter’s tie up with truecallar dot com. “The
website normally maintains database of the mobile numbers and names of the
users worldwide from the online forms filed in the internet and other documents
having customer information,” the official added.
With the number
of mobile users increasing significantly, a number of VAS services are being
offered by telecom companies and third party VAS service providers. Despite the
growth in services, the government has failed to effectively regulate VAS in
the absence of a standard guideline to check if the services and their charges
are reasonable.
No comments:
Post a Comment